Skip to content
Prime Partners, Chartered Accountants
Prime Partners adviser reviewing a business structure in North Sydney
Business Structuring & Review

Business structuring and review for owners whose structure no longer fits.

Most structures are built at inception and rarely revisited. As the business grows, the original framework drifts from how it actually operates.

A structure review examines whether your companies, trusts and partnerships still serve their owners, across tax efficiency, asset protection, Division 7A exposure, succession and restructure rollovers. We assess the existing group and design the path forward for an agreed fixed fee. It suits established, multi-entity businesses whose structure has drifted from how they operate today.

In short

Do not wait for a trigger event to force the question.

By the time a crisis demands a structure review, options are often constrained by time, tax consequences or third-party expectations. We work with established businesses, not startups choosing a first structure, to assess whether the current setup remains fit for purpose and, where it does not, to design and coordinate the path forward. Proactive reviews are always less disruptive and less expensive than reactive restructuring.

When to review

The triggers we see most often.

The business has outgrown its original structure

What worked as a sole trader or single company rarely scales into a multi-million dollar operation. Growth, new employees, expansion and rising regulatory obligations all pressure a structure never designed for the current reality.

New entities have been added without an overall strategy

Companies, trusts and holding entities accumulate over time, often on different advisers' advice at different points. Without a coordinated group strategy, the additions create duplication, confusion and unnecessary cost.

Owners are unsure the structure is still tax effective

Tax law changes regularly. What was efficient five years ago may not be now. Division 7A, trust distribution rules, CGT concessions and franking credit measures all affect how structures perform over time.

Personal guarantees or cross-collateralisation are a concern

Guarantees given to lenders, landlords or suppliers often create exposure that was never intended. A review identifies where personal and business risk are intertwined and whether separation is achievable.

Expansion, acquisition or investment is being considered

Before acquiring a business, taking on investors or entering a joint venture, the structure needs to accommodate the new arrangement without unintended tax, liability or governance consequences.

Succession planning is raising ownership questions

Transitioning ownership to the next generation, bringing key employees into equity, or preparing for sale all require the structure to support orderly transfer of control and value.

Lenders are asking for clearer governance

Banks and institutional lenders increasingly require clear group structures, consolidated reporting and identifiable borrowing entities. A fragmented structure can delay or prevent financing.

What it covers

What a business structure review covers, across six areas.

The scope is tailored to the complexity of the group and the concerns that prompted the review.

Structural review of existing entities
Mapping every entity, companies, trusts, partnerships, SMSFs and legacy structures, documenting each one's purpose and whether it still serves a function. This often reveals redundant entities or gaps where one should exist.
Ownership & control alignment
Reviewing who owns and controls what against the owners' intentions, across share registers and unit holdings, trust deeds and trustee appointments, director registers, and powers of attorney.
Group & multi-entity coordination
Assessing how the group functions as a whole, intercompany agreements, transfer pricing, loan arrangements and fund flows, where Division 7A loans and uncommercial related-party transactions commonly create risk.
Tax efficiency assessment
Evaluating the structure against current tax law, income splitting and distribution, CGT planning and small business concessions, franking credit management, Division 7A compliance, and GST and payroll tax grouping.
Structural planning before change
Where an acquisition, capital raise, partnership, succession or sale is approaching, assessing whether the structure can accommodate it or whether pre-event restructuring is required, since change after a transaction is almost always costlier.
Restructuring implementation coordination
Coordinating tax and accounting, legal, ASIC and regulatory, banking and insurance, acting as the central coordinator so every adviser works from the same blueprint and nothing falls between the gaps.
Who it's for

Established businesses that have evolved beyond their original setup.

Growing owner-operated businesses

Turning over $1 million to $10 million, started simple and added complexity while growing. Common issues include operating through a trust set up before the business became profitable, personal and business assets in the same entity, undocumented intercompany arrangements, and an accountant managing compliance but not structure.

Medium-sized & multi-entity groups

Multiple trading entities, holding companies and trusts, typically $10 million to $50 million, built incrementally rather than designed. Common issues include duplicated entities, informal Division 7A loans, unintended payroll tax grouping, and unclear succession arrangements.

Larger privately owned businesses

Complex ownership, multiple generations or significant asset holdings, needing structures that balance tax efficiency with protection, governance and intergenerational planning. Common issues include family trusts that no longer reflect the family's wishes, governance lagging growth, and stalled intergenerational transfers.

Our approach

From understanding to action, without unnecessary delay.

A structured five-step process, where many reviews by other practices stop at a report. We see it through to implementation.

1
Map
Map the current position
We document the full group, every entity, ownership link and intercompany arrangement, reviewing trust deeds, constitutions, shareholder agreements, ASIC records and financials. The output is a clear structural map most clients have never had produced before.
2
Identify
Identify misalignment
With the position mapped, we assess where the structure diverges from what the business needs, tax inefficiencies, governance gaps, asset protection weaknesses and operational friction, in a written assessment setting out each issue, its significance and the risk of leaving it unaddressed.
3
Design
Design the appropriate structure
We develop a recommended structure that is practical to implement. Not every problem needs a new entity. Often the solution is amending existing arrangements, formalising undocumented practices or deregistering entities no longer needed. Where restructuring is recommended, we model the tax cost of each option.
4
Coordinate
Coordinate implementation
Once agreed, we coordinate across accounting, legal and regulatory disciplines, preparing a timeline, assigning responsibilities and managing the process to completion. Recommendations without implementation are just reports, so we see it through.
5
Revisit
Revisit as the business evolves
A review is not a one-time exercise. We recommend revisiting at least every three to five years, or whenever a significant event occurs. For ongoing clients, we build structural monitoring into regular advisory meetings.
Tax implications of restructuring

Restructuring almost always has tax consequences.

Understanding them in advance is essential to informed decisions. We model each before any change is implemented.

Capital gains tax

Transferring assets between entities can trigger CGT, though rollover provisions allow restructuring without immediate consequences, including Subdivision 122 (sole trader to company), Subdivision 124-M (company restructures and demergers) and Subdivision 328-G (small business restructure rollover under $10 million turnover). Each has specific conditions that must be met.

Stamp duty

State and territory duty applies to transfers of certain assets, particularly real property and goodwill. Rates vary by jurisdiction, and corporate restructure concessions may apply. Duty is often the largest single cost in a restructure and must be modelled beforehand.

Division 7A

Where a private company lends to shareholders or associates, Division 7A deems the loan a dividend unless a compliant agreement is in place. Moving assets or funds between related entities must be carefully managed to avoid triggering it.

GST and indirect taxes

Asset transfers between GST-registered entities may trigger GST unless the going concern or GST group exemptions apply. We identify and manage all indirect tax consequences as part of the process.

Asset protection

Separating business risk from personal wealth.

Effective structuring can separate trading risk from personal wealth, though no structure offers absolute protection.

Separating trading risk from asset holdings

The most fundamental strategy is keeping high-risk trading in an entity that holds few assets, with valuable property, IP or investments held in separate entities.

Trust structures for asset protection

Discretionary trusts are commonly used because trust property belongs to the trust, not any beneficiary. The protection depends on the deed terms, how the trust has been administered, and whether distributions or appointments can be challenged.

Director and guarantor exposure

Directors face personal liability in certain circumstances, including insolvent trading, unpaid employee entitlements and PAYG withholding. We review director exposure in every assessment and recommend strategies to limit personal risk.

The limits of asset protection

No structure protects assets from all creditors in all circumstances. Courts can look through structures established mainly to defeat creditors, and personal guarantees override entity separation. We advise on realistic expectations and practical strategies.

How long it takes

Timelines by group complexity.

These cover the review and recommendation stages. Implementation is additional and depends on the scope of changes.

Group complexityTypical timeline
Single entity with 1-2 owners2 to 4 weeks
2-5 entities with family involvement4 to 8 weeks
Multi-entity group (6+ entities)8 to 12 weeks
Complex private group, intergenerational12 to 16+ weeks
Why Prime Partners

We design the structure, then see it through.

Prime Partners are chartered accountants with offices in North Sydney and Orange. Our team works with established and multi-entity groups across professional services, construction, property, agribusiness, healthcare and technology. You can see how we help in each of these on our industries pages. Where many structure reviews end at a report, we coordinate implementation across accounting, legal and regulatory disciplines and see the process to completion.

Related services

Where structure intersects with the rest of the advisory.

Common questions

Questions, answered.

Is this only necessary when something is wrong?
No. A structure review is not a remedial exercise. Many businesses seek one because they are growing, planning for the future, or simply want confirmation the current structure remains appropriate. Identifying improvements before problems arise is always more cost-effective than responding after the fact.
Do you set up new entities as part of this work?
Where the review identifies the need for new companies, trusts or other entities, we coordinate their establishment in the implementation phase, including constitutions, trust deeds and ASIC registrations. Equally, the review may conclude that existing entities should be retained, amended or wound up rather than new ones created.
Will this involve our legal advisers?
In most cases, yes. Structural changes usually require legal documentation, new trust deeds, shareholder agreements, constitutions and intercompany contracts. We work with your solicitors or can recommend experienced commercial lawyers. We design the structure and coordinate the process; the legal work is prepared by qualified practitioners.
When should a business review its structure?
At least every three to five years, and whenever a significant event occurs, substantial revenue growth, adding or removing partners, an acquisition, beginning succession planning or receiving external investment. Many clients schedule a structural check-in as part of their annual advisory engagement.
What is the difference between a company and trust structure?
A company is a separate legal entity with limited liability that pays tax at a flat rate. A trust is a relationship where a trustee holds assets for beneficiaries. Companies suit businesses retaining profits, issuing equity or eventually selling. Trusts offer flexibility in distributing income but face more complex integrity rules. Many businesses use both, for example a trust holding shares in a trading company.
How does business restructuring affect tax?
Restructuring can trigger capital gains tax, stamp duty and income tax consequences. Several rollover and exemption provisions allow restructuring with deferred or reduced tax impact. The key is planning before it happens, so the most efficient pathway is identified. Restructuring without advance tax modelling is one of the most expensive mistakes a business can make.
Can you help with asset protection structures?
Yes. Asset protection is one of the core reasons owners seek a review. We assess where business risk and personal wealth intersect and recommend structures that separate trading risk from asset holdings, typically holding valuable assets in entities that do not carry trading liabilities. We are transparent about the limits, no structure provides absolute protection, and structures established to defeat existing creditors can be challenged.
How long does a business structure review take?
A single entity with straightforward ownership typically takes two to four weeks for the review and recommendations. Multi-entity groups with family involvement generally need four to eight weeks. Complex private groups with intergenerational issues may take twelve weeks or more. Implementation timelines are additional and depend on the scope of changes.
Do you work with multi-entity groups?
Yes. Multi-entity groups are our core focus for this service. Businesses operating through multiple companies, trusts and other entities benefit most from a coordinated review. We assess how the group functions as a whole, including intercompany agreements, funding flows, consolidation opportunities and governance.
What triggers the need for business restructuring?
The most common triggers are significant revenue growth, changes in ownership or management, acquisition or disposal of assets, new investor participation, succession planning and lender requirements for clearer governance. Changes in tax law can also render a previously efficient structure suboptimal. Proactive reviews are always less disruptive than reactive restructuring.

Request a business structure review.

If your business has grown beyond its original structure, added entities over time, or is approaching a significant change, a review can provide clarity and direction. We begin with a conversation to understand your situation, then a scoped proposal. No obligation, no generic advice.

Contact Prime Partners
Prime Insights

Clear thinking on the decisions that matter.

Once a month we send our latest thinking on tax, business, and the moments that shape a year. Practical, considered, and written for people who would rather understand the why than chase the headline.

Stay in the loop

Some of the biggest calls in a business and a life land between the appointments and the deadlines. Following along keeps you close to how we think, so when one of those moments turns up, you already know where to find us.

Trusted and accredited
★★★★★4.8 on Google from 70+ reviews100+ years combined experience
CPA AustraliaChartered Accountants ANZXero Platinum Partner